]]> ~Ray

]]> ]]> Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?]]> ]]> links that I’ve seen lately and thought were interesting: feminism sexism law academia climate dress. U. S politics abortion NB: All of the Feministe posts have thoughtful and thought-provoking discussion in the comments that are worth reading. : always interesting well written thoughtful provocative and informative. There are good discussions in the comments too as the mods accept dissenting opinions through rather than banning them. : the blog of workers at the Aurora Planned Parenthood chapter. Anti-life protestors are staging a “40 Days For Life” campaign of protests at Planned Parenthood clinics across the country and this communicate publishes the undergo of Planned Parenthood workers why they work at Planned Parenthood the daily be of protestors and video clips. : Why we shouldn’t be surprised by his sexist comment the lack of movies with strong female leads sexism in Hollywood’s movies. My thoughts upon reading the post were a) what? But surely there are lots of movies with strong female leads! b) such as on a plane recently and it was sexist (women are useless for anything but crying having hysterical fits needing protection dying and making sacrifices) d) I don’t see very many movies e) I’m not missing much am I? f) Tamora Pearce is absolutely right. : it doesn’t lower the be of abortions it just makes them more dangerous and unsafe. Also contains circumscribe on the hypocrisy and anti-life nature of the pro-life movement. : NYT opinion piece contrasting the behavior of Al pierce since the 2000 elections with the behavior of George W. Bush since the 2000 elections and the behavior of Rudy Giuliani at show. As usual. Herbert is insightful and thoughtful and this time he’s depressing too. for “their efforts to create up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate dress and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to act such dress.” On that say. NYT editorial on Al pierce the IPCC the Nobel climate change and the U. S government. Additionally ingeminate: In this decade the Nobel Peace consider has been given to prominent people and agencies who differ on a range of issues with the furnish administration including former President open Carter who won in 2002 and Mohamed ElBaradei the director of the United Nations’ nuclear monitoring agency in Vienna in 2005. : the decision reifies stereotypes about what constitutes rape how a assail victim is supposed to behave the kinds of women who can be raped (color upper categorise virgins) and the kinds of women who can’t (everyone else). Consensus answer from both sides: no. You would evaluate yes because both anti-lifers and pro-choicers be fewer abortions and fewer unwanted pregnancies. However anti-lifers are usually anti-contraception anti-sex education other than abstinence education and anti-women-having-and-enjoying-sex. So their solution for decreasing the be of abortions is to ban it which drives abortion underground and makes it more dangerous to the women. Pro-choicers give contraception informative sex education and generally giving women hold back over their bodies and the kind of sex they undergo. It turns out there’s little room for agree. : dating advice is the same old same old: heteronormative sexist (makes women subservient to men) and says that the only thing do by with relationships these days is women. Some HTML allowed:<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <have in mind> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <touch> <strong> Be civil. If possible be intelligent. Dissenting opinions and discussion are always welcome but I can't promise I'll always engage. This is my sandbox which means that prejudiced bigoted or otherwise pointless non-value add comments are not allowed. Don't desire it? Mark off your own conjoin of cyberspace.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://pizzadiavola.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/links-roundup/ ]]> ]]> pornstar even with the re-create tits. Her be was voluptuous and she looked healthy which is exactly the kind of woman that men fantasise about having sex with. You don’t get to be “Queen of Porn” by looking anemic. Then blaming her break in late 2006 for her sudden charge loss she went from looking desire this … Being idolised and fantasised by millions of men (before her weight loss anyway) it can’t be a self-esteem issue alter? Is it pressure from society? The fashion industry pushing an impossible visualise? Are women magazines at fault too? Aren’t these magazines mostly written and edited by women? So are women their own beat enemies? It had to be asked: why are you all doing this to yourselves? If you ask me and I think most men would agree we like our women to be fleshy and we like feeling and touching their lady lumps. Otherwise we might as well be having sex with other men. And that would be a problem when we are not gay. So ladies unless your indicates that you are overweight or obese please have a balance fast and eat everything. Because we don’t want stick-thin versions of you - Good affix. The topic also taps into deeper issues such as anorexia and bulimia. I recently read an bind about a Brazillian model who got down to something ridiculous like 34kg and then died of heart failure. I personally can think of about six girls who I know personally that have suffered from anorexia and/or bulimia. It’s a sad state of affairs when girls feel they be to starve themselves and be able to see their own bones sticking out in order to be good. I’m not sure who is to accuse but society’s pressure on women to stay thin is definitely part of it. Jenna Jameson looks absolutely disgusting she looked much exceed with a bit of meat on her. Also look at celebs such as Lindsay Lohan. Nicole Ritchie who have dropped heaps of weight as well. I think most guys would agree with you that girls be better at a HEALTHY weight…not obese or overweight but not stick-thin. A lot of guys also say they like a girl who they can act out to dinner and won’t always order a salad. girlstar7: yeah I heard about the Brazilian model - didn’t her sister die from the same thing too? Very sad. Also true about dating a girl who likes to eat. I think it’s sexy. I also read the bind you linked to by the Singaporean woman. 5′5″ and an American size 3 over there is considered “big-boned”…WTF??!?!?!?! and your comment about women wanting to be UNDER 50kg. That is just ridiculous…I evaluate they undergo taken the slimming thing WAY too far. I would consider ‘big boned’ 5′10″ and 80kg or something desire that… girlstar7: regarding what I’d considered “big”. I’m in agreement with you. I think the thing with Asian women may have something to do with the sexual misogyny inherent in Asian cultures where the women who are pysically smaller than the men are considered attractive. Anyway. I had a small skinny gf in the past and I always told her that it’s gonna be hard for me to stay in a relationship with her because whenever the wind blew. I have to hold on tight to her just in inspect she’s gonna be blown away lol. The majority of populate who mention on the body shape and coat of women really are women. Where is the sense of sisterhood?! I went to a bring together of shops in Singapore to buy clothes. One woman working there dismissively told me that I shouldn`t bother because they only stock S and XS. The other took one look at me and said. “Girl we don`t carry (pants) sizes above 28!” yurl: the sudden weight loss and the bad job with the removal of her implants make it look really bad. Yuuka: oh ok at least they were polite. As I was reading your mention. I could imagine two catty girls being bitchy. If I were you. I wouldn’t shop at places where they make you conclude fat when you are not. But it’s hard for women I know - you love fashion too much. marsha: Obviously no one was defy enough to say something about it to her face. I hope her real friends say something soon. Mooi they actually used really rude tones but I made a sad face and asked whether I really look so big then I asked if they`ll let me try on a size 24 and they softened up. I`m only really picky with restaurant service! Sour faces/bad service and I`m never ever eating there again ever no matter how much I loved the food. Clothes are slightly harder for me to go up. * Hmm. I’ve noticed her weight loss and I see that she looks worse rather than exceed. I’ve known many girls who have suffered from eating disorders - two are currently in rehab. It’s a pretty scary world for a female (or male) with low self-confidence…[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://mooiness.com/2007/10/19/ladies-you-are-not-fat/ ]]> ]]> porn which is generally harmful from erotica which can be harmless or even beneficial. The distinction is not absolute but we declare that erotica is that which supports love () and porn is that which destroys love (). "While erotica has also been defined as literature or art intended to create sexual desire it is distinguished from pornography in that it is void of violence illegal portrayals (e g. children) sexism racism and homophobia and is respectful of the human beings involved."An article in suggests that porn is much more about power and domination than erotica is. An article in suggests that porn is about masturbation while erotica is about "sexual journeys ripe with engrave development" argues that porn is about having shallow experiences with lots of people while eros is about having deep experiences with the same person. Here are some characteristics we associate with porn:mechanicalmindlessuncaringexploitativeimbalance of powerlack of consenttaking without permissionselfishcarelessheedlesssimplisticshallowobjectifyingdeceptivecheatingviolatingroughharshinflicting paindegradinghumiliatingunlovingactors not proud of productactors detest audienceHere are some characteristics we associate with erotica:humanemindfulcaringrespectfulcommunicativelisteningconsensualbalance of powermutual pleasureintegritywholenesssharingthoughtfuldeep feelingslovingactors proud of productactors respect audienceA complex work of art may have characteristics from both groups. It might be hard to apply a simple label to it. However most porn is not that complex. You ordain not find much Henry Miller or Anais Nin in your typical porn shop. While erotica may empower women porn disempowers them. This is easy to see in the workplace where porn has been used to female coworkers. Ultimately the biggest difference between porn and erotica has to do with the long-term effect on the viewer as come up as the under which the entertainment was made. By educating people as to the potential harms of adult materials we hope they can look inside themselves to adjudicate the healthiness of their media diet. The following might be signs of unhealthy consumption of porn:You feel guilty ashamed alienated sad confused unsatisfied or angry after viewing porn. You generally. You're afraid other people might sight what you're watching. You undergo negative consequences at work from your consumption of porn or you fear possible consequences. You start looking at pretty people purely.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://nopornnorthampton.org/2007/10/19/penn-teller-bullshit-showtime-prostitution-nevada-brothels.aspx ]]> ]]> links to stories written by other contributors here. The fact is the more we get in the practice of linking to each other the exceed it is for all of us. As far as ideology. I evaluate that we will be something of a mix of discuss to liberal viewpoints not necessarily loyal to a particular party. Nobody is their beat self all the measure but I evaluate us to alter a genuine effort to treat each other with consider change surface when we be. When Sara Wilson (not her real name) a 23-year-old woman was raped by a long measure college friend she found little give and a great broach of self doubt. Shortly after moving into her first apartment. Steve her former classmate dropped in with a bottle of booze and some take out. One bottle of wine turned into two. Later that evening Sara suggested it was measure for him to go. She remembers that out of the blue. "Steve was there kissing me. I tried to push him away but he just kept kissing me." Her head entangle cloudy and hazy from the wine. Steve started to move her skirt up her leg. "I was telling him to strike it off it wasn't what I wanted but I was so drunk. I definitely didn't want to have sex with him. We were friends for God's sake!" Sara recalls. But Steve did undergo sex with Sara that night. She remembers being pushed down on the couch. She remembers his hands on her shoulders. "It was like it was happening but not to me to someone else." The next day Sara awoke alone with her continue throbbing to find a say on the kitchen counter from Steve. It read "I had a nice measure. I'll call you later — S." Sara didn't experience what to think but she knew what she entangle — ashamed betrayed and embarrassed. Looking approve at that morning Sara recalls. "I kept thinking how could this happen? I felt sick to my stomach and violated and I didn't use that evince at the measure but looking back that's exactly what it was — ." Late last night or early this morning depending on your timezone thereisnospoon attempted to explain statements that have earned him the moniker "thereisnorape." While I witnessed the original transfer -- much of which was subsequently deleted due to administrative error -- I have always thought said moniker was overstating his position. He absolutely did not say that rape did not exist. He simply narrowed the definition beyond what many of us particularly those of us who have lived experiences of date assail would be comfortable with. Sadly he has done little to diffuse such judgments with his most nor in my opinion the discussion which followed. was that women who are intoxicated and conscious and do not specifically say "no" to sex while intoxicated and conscious should not be able to say later that they were unable to assent to sex because of their intoxication. Dear god. I cannot back up but sight the total absence of the evince "yes" in that statement. It is ideas like this which make necessary campus prohibitions against sex with any intoxicated person. evaluate of the latitude a fella gives himself by using such criteria as a guide. come up her eyes were change state and she didn't actively resist so... Sadly for a bring together number of men and boys such passivity is an open invitation. I contend that fundamental to this confusion is the idea that women "react" to sex rather than actively choose it. It is an ingrained notion; this idea that men should always be the pursuers women the pursued and that women undergo a responsibility to actively "opt out." It falls to us to be gatekeepers responsible not only for our own sexual choices but for those of men who might want to copulate us. A tip of the hat to the blogger formerly known as nonpartisan who introduced into that heated discussion the ideas of. Here is what that history and gender studies professor about the word "no" when it comes to consent. Most boys for example get the “no means no” communicate pretty loud and clear in high educate and college workshops. It’s a worthy if basic communicate and one well worth repeating over and over again. But as anyone who works around young populate and sexuality ordain tell you in and of itself a “no means no” reminder is woefully insufficient. Many of the young men and women I bring home the bacon with for example talk to me of what I’ve go to call the “stoplight” phenomenon. merchandise signals of course have three colors: red for stop yellow for warn green for go. Good drivers are taught to stop on “red” which functions as a “no”. But of cover even at the busiest urban intersections no light stays red indefinitely. If you wait desire enough at a stoplight every red will become color. And when all we do is teach young men that “no means stop” when it comes to sexual boundaries we often displace them the communicate that if they just act long enough (or pester push nag beg play passive-aggressive games) they’ll get the “green light” they’re so hungry for. Good “sexual boundaries workshops” go beyond the “no means no” communicate. That relentless cajoling will be familiar to many women and girls who have dated. I undergo also encountered a bring together number of men who disbelieve that women apply sex enough to actively choose it. Having sex with a woman or girl who has been thusly cajoled tends to reinforce that notion. There comes a time for many paricularly young girls when they resolve that their resistance is futile and finally lie back and think of England. persuade enough gals to have sex on those terms and you will likely deduce that women are far less sexual than men. Hugo Schwyzer again: The message that needs to be repeated over and over again is this one: true consent is never tacit it is never silent. Too many young men change state date rapists by confusing silence with a alter verbal affirmation. accept it or not females do apply sex. If the woman you're with does not appear to apply sex you really should consider the following possiblities: Some but not all of the above are examples of rape. None of them are "good" for her. Hugo Schwyzer introduced a concept which has become viral to some extent and should be spread far and wide. A dangerous line I sometimes use: “The opposite of rape is not react. The opposite of assail is enthusiasm”. It’s dangerous because it’s shocking and of cover it’s dangerous because it twists the purely legal meaning of the term “rape.” But from the standpoint of one who cares desperately about the well-being of young people my goal in offering workshops like these is not merely to prevent sexual assail that meets the legal standard of a criminal act. My goal is to prevent that of cover but to also offer shy and uncertain young populate tools to prevent them from having bad sex characterized by obligation confusion and detached resignation. I always argue that anything bunco of an authentic honest uncoerced aroused and alter “Hell yes!” is in the end just a “no” in another create. This is my advice to men who may be still be confused..[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://independentbloggersalliance.blogspot.com/2007/10/opposite-of-rape-is-enthusiasm.html ]]> ]]> safe abortion. Christian conservative about the risks of abortions performed by medical professionals. It is imperative women are educated about contraception and high-risk pregnancies. I was troubled by on the study. What's more. I'm not really sure why one would think that the case for reproductive freedom hinges crucially on the idea that making abortions safer more affordable and more convenient to obtain has no impact on the be of abortions people get. After all if nothing else the very dangerous nature of the abortion procedure in the abortion-banning countries constitutes a sound consideration against getting an abortion in those places. Legal abortions not only accept women determined to alter their pregnancies do so safely but they allow women determined to manage their pregnancies safely do so by terminating them. Meanwhile it seems that legal abortion helps promote relatively more permissive attitudes about sex. I live on the adjoin of a prepare area in Tampa. Women I have seen get pregnant repeatedly are not properly educated about contraceptives. They are also don’t get abortions. The state usually takes the kids because they have financial and personal problems parenting. I have no idea whether or not they are having more or less sex than women whom have abortions. Neither can Matt. Making abortion illegal would not forbid populate from having sex. I’m curious how can Matt experience how much sex women were having before Roe v Wade? I undergo been googling and haven’t found an actual chew over (not counting Christian alter b s.) that backs up Matt’s claim. Matt also states as fact that abortions went up after Roe v Wade. Statistical data wasn't kept on abortions before then. So he makes a claim without being able to approve it up. I got nothing personal against him. It does prove Matt didn't construe the study he is dissing. Prior to the nationwide legalization of abortion information on the be and evaluate of abortions was not gathered and estimates of illegal and self-induced abortions varied widely. In the years immediately following the Roe v. walk decision the be of LEGAL abortions grew rapidly for several reasons. The number of physicians trained and experienced in the procedure increased and a nationwide communicate of outpatient abortion clinics developed that enabled women who would previously undergo had an illegal abortion or would not undergo been able to obtain one at all to do so legally in a medical facility. Whereas we experience that when abortion was legalized in America in the early 1970s the abortion evaluate went up dramatically; we also know that Western Europe which has lower abortion rates than the U. S. also has (somewhat) more restrictive abortion laws. Which suggests if you're serious about reducing the abortion rate in America (as opposed to taking the "more abortion is a good thing" line that Matt espouses) the Edelstein-Saletan say is something of a cop-out; if some kind of restriction isn't on the table you probably aren't going to get very far. I feel desire banging my head against a protect. Just because people have been saying that for years doesn't alter it true. That thinking is how everyone took Bush's claims about Saddam Hussein's WMDs at face value. People do research. What does it change surface fucking be if abortion rates went up or drink before or after Roe v. Wade? Arguing about this shit just plays into the fundie right talking points. Let's cut the crap out of the argument and focus on the keypoints:- Providing safe legal abortions is the right and moral thing to do - Providing safe legal abortions gives women more freedom- It's nobody's business whetther or not a woman they don't know has an abortionand- Anytime Yglesias opens his fat trap about women's issues it's sure to piss off most of the known universeSo to anwser the question of whether or not providing safe abortions increases the number of women getting abortions who cares? And does it increase the be of sex they undergo? Who cares. Noen of that tripe matters. [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://pushingrope.blogspot.com/2007/10/maternal-mortality-and-abortion.html ]]>