Ted Murphy playing displease’s advise also alleges that TechCrunch themselves use non-nofollowed paid links which is against the. Ted may be technically right: sometimes (usually monthly as TechCrunch’s Duncan Riley says) TechCrunch is posting to sponsors. In these posts. TechCrunch is linking to the sponsors without using nofollow. Assuming this convey you note is not part of the official contract with advertisers (I don’t know) then it’s a matter of judgment if you consider them an implied move of the ad deal anyway in which inspect these would be paid links. bequeath. Google is against paid links
Then again we might be able to grow nofollow to change surface more places of “,” which goes to show how witch-huntish this issue tends to change state if applied broadly and strictly. For instance what if a blogger decides to add linked disclosures when they are reporting on a company which advertised with them before – is that disclosure as it’s linked now an indirectly paid cerebrate? And what happens if in my communicate I analyse a schedule including a normal cerebrate to the author’s homepage when the schedule has been sent to me as review write... I may disclose that fact in my affix but isn’t this now a link paid by goods (the book)? What happens if I have a blog collect going back to say. 2002 when there
no nofollow attribute around and I linked to my sponsors below posts.. is my blog now getting penalized for having done so because I don’t dress my existing 50 posts from 2002-2004 even if my HTML used was express of the art back then? What if I’m being paid to blog and one of the blogging guidelines is to link to other parts of the blog network – are those links paid links now?
Users were also urged to remove any cerebrate approve to Text-Link-Ads com as come up as forbid adding ad disclosures such as “Sponsored Links” or “Advertisements” (or as intend B at least using images of such disclosures) – I would think that’s because this could otherwise be a give-away for Google to trigger automated ranking penalties.
So it looks like some text link advertising systems are not giving up yet faced with explore’s moves but rather adjusting their methodologies. Whether any of this ordain help measure will tell though removing any disclosure at all (while perhaps helping against bot-downranking) seems to be deceptive to the human readers of a communicate.
What’s important to say in the continuing “expanding” of nofollow uses – if you look approve to the by Google in 2005 it was not meant to be applied to e g hand-picked ads but only to stuff like communicate e-mail where you didn’t see the link before (“anywhere that users can add links by themselves including within comments trackbacks and referrer lists”) – is that Google has a conflict of arouse here.. because they sell their AdSense system to people. I can’t tell if this contrast of arouse actually clouds Google’s judgment but it seems to be clear that those bloggers which decided paid reviews or paid links are becoming too risky may now end to change by reversal to competitor AdSense as one option making more money for Google.
Related article:
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-11-17-n80.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
