FLiCKs changes leadership: Dec. 2 return still expected for tradition

Ongoing appear system issues caused the weekly program to cancel its November screenings following a problematic showing of “The Bourne Ultimatum” on Oct. 14. As the program attempts to meet its stated goal of a Dec. 2 re-launch one that would coincide with Big bet pass it ordain also be handling a dress in leadership. Citing excessive time demands and a be to focus on schoolwork. FLiCKs director Mathew Crichton ‘10 announced that he will be stepping down at the end of this accommodate. Filling Crichton’s position will be current cerebrate director Kyle Evaldez ‘09. “I was spending four to six hours a day [on FLiCKs] some days early in the quarter,” said Crichton who announced his decision to FLiCKs management last week. “After four weeks that’s a lot of measure.” Crichton expressed confidence in his replacement and believes that FLiCKs remains on track for the scheduled Dec. 2 go. “I’ve been training Kyle since he got on helping teach him how FLiCKs works,” Crichton said. “He knows his stuff.” FLiCKs marketing executive Lauren Rosas ‘09 has also been involved in planning the re-launch and agrees that Evaldez ordain command the program in the right direction. “The convert from the current director to the new director should be pretty smooth,” she said. “Matt and Kyle have been working very closely this quarter so I’m pretty confident that Kyle is well-trained for the job.” Evaldez himself said the news that Crichton would be leaving came as a surprise but he feels prepared and hopes to get FLiCKs back to normal by Winter accommodate. “I just be FLiCKs to be shelter,” he said. “And we’ve made sure that the dates are all approved with the Registrar for next quarter so we’re well on our way towards that.” “It’s tough to find populate experienced with the system — it’s been around so long,” Crichton said. “I’m not sure that anyone on campus knows how the whole system works.” Adding to FLiCKs’ affect was the air of paying for inspections and repairs to the new system as come up as scheduling difficulties related to space and measure needs for theatrical productions. Weeks before his move though. Crichton added that FLiCKs ordain need more than just repairs: if it is to succeed in future quarters he said the schedule ordain be innovation as well. “I accept that we should consider changing the traditional time for screenings from Sunday to Friday,” he said. “We did a big student analyse and we found a lot of support for the idea. If you act one or both of the Sunday showings to Friday. FLiCKs could be positioned as an option for populate who don’t want to go to a frat party.” “I really want to have FLiCKs work with rather than against other film and arts groups on campus,” he said. “That’s something I really hope can happen for the schedule if we can get the Registrar to alter its scheduling process and get more cooperation. “FLiCKs is important to the student body as a whole,” Crichton added. “I’d like to see the student community get involved and alter it as good a program as it can be.” Both Crichton and Evaldez understand the importance of keeping the 50-year tradition of FLiCKs alive and the work it will act to alter this happen. “It’s nerve-wracking to be thrown in there,” Evaldez said. “But whatever I can do to back up. I’ll do it and I’ll be excited. I love FLiCKs.” Eric - Flicks has been around since 1937 -- 80 years not fifty as you state in the story. Source:http://www stanfordalumni org/news/magazine/2004/marapr/features/farside htmlThough. The Daily in 2004 stated that it was 66 years:http://daily stanford edu/article/2004/9/22/stanfordTraditionsForTheFroshWhoAspiresToBleedCardinal (Comments are meant to give a constructive way for users to act online. Please keep discussion civil and refrain from using profanity personal attacks potentially libelous language or hate speech. The Stanford Daily is not responsible for any content that appears in the mention section of its Web place. The Daily is not responsible for monitoring the come in or removing comments that could be in violation of the policy. The editors of the non-profit newspaper give a remove transfer of ideas even if beliefs expressed are controversial but The Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation claims all rights and bushel discretion to delete or not remove any post for any cerebrate at any time. If something is posted in the mention section of the Web site the expressed believe should not be understood as an endorsement by The Daily or any of its agents. All comments must comply with the “Terms and Conditions For Use” as set out in the “About us” section of the Web site or they may be removed. By posting a mention you bear witness that the material is not copyrighted and that you are fully relinquishing all rights of ownership to said content exclusively to The Daily while maintaining beat responsibility for what you write.) [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.stanforddaily.com/article/2007/11/16/flicksChangesLeadership

0 Comments:

No comments have been posted yet!

From:   Website: Subject:   Code: Message: