Blogger rules.
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-20 21:29:42
This morning I got a message in my mention box from Dan Kleinman. Dan’s the guy who thinks the American Library Association is a a front group for The Homosexual Agenda and wants the book. Fat Kid Rules the World banned from school reading lists. Dan lives in New Jersey. He wants the book banned in Alsip. Illinois. Go figure.
Dan’s message attacks the ALA and has (really) an extended description of oral sex. I wouldn’t print it. This is not a social communicate site. It’s a blog that represents my views. I print the comments I find interesting or that push the conversation along. I don’t create stuff I sight offensive or discussions that have gone on too desire and I make up my rules as I go along. One new one (because it never occurred to me before) is that I don’t print Dan’s descriptions of oral sex. My blog.
On the other transfer there are people who create verbally on the internet and then are shocked to discover that their writing has ended up on someone’s blog. Where have they been? You write an e-mail or you displace a message to a blogger and you think it is just between the two of you?
My brother Mike did a series of postings on his site about Williamson Evers. Evers is the neo-conservative and former aide to Iraq’s affix invasion US chief. Paul Bremer. Evers is furnish’s choice to work in the Department of Education.
Neal McCluskey works for the Cato initiate a right-wing think tank. Amazingly. Evers is too much for even the Cato thinkers. McCluskey wrote Mike and tried to distance himself from Evers. When Mike posted McCluskey’s earn. McCluskey got nervous and asked Mike to take it drink.
What world do these populate live in? When you send an e-mail put something on the internet you can’t get do-overs. No take-backs. Now if you had made clear from the beginning that it was a private conversation. But change surface then guys it’s the internet!
I just read the Stanford Daily’s article about Williamson Evers’ challenges getting confirmed by the Senate and saw that you thought Evers’ appointment was intended to cater the Cato initiate. I can understand why you think that given Mr. Evers’s past association with the initiate but at this point at least when it comes to education policy we are on very different sides. Mr. Evers is a vociferous advocate for state standards and No Child Left Behind and we are very much against those things. I point this out only because populate have a.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://preaprez.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/blogger-rules/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
